|
|
 | |
 | Ann <nntpmail@e | | NewsGroup User |
| Re: What's in it for them? | 6/10/2008 4:16:46 PM |
| 0 |   |
| On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:18:05 -0400, Elmo wrote:
> Ann wrote: >> Both my electric (REC) and phone companies have just begun letting >> customers pay their bill online, by credit (or debit) card. Ordinarily >> an organization would do this because paying the credit card processing >> fee costs less than hand-processing paper checks. But, both are small >> outfits and I doubt either will realize the potential savings by cutting >> cousin Bill's wife back to part time. >> >> I wonder if, given the number of people who have, reportedly, fallen >> behind on their utility bills, the objective is to have customers go >> (further) into debt with their credit card companies instead? > > Other benefits would include faster funds availability and fewer problems > with bounced check fees. And if you go further into debt to someone else > as long as they get paid it's not their problem.
I wonder how the funds availability will work out. Since the REC has a 5% late pay penalty, I have usually paid them early. Now, it will be the day before. <g>
|
 | AL <lithar@hami | | NewsGroup User |
| Re: What's in it for them? | 6/10/2008 5:51:30 PM |
| 0 |   |
| Ann wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:18:05 -0400, Elmo wrote: > >> Ann wrote: >>> Both my electric (REC) and phone companies have just begun letting >>> customers pay their bill online, by credit (or debit) card. Ordinarily >>> an organization would do this because paying the credit card processing >>> fee costs less than hand-processing paper checks. But, both are small >>> outfits and I doubt either will realize the potential savings by cutting >>> cousin Bill's wife back to part time. >>> >>> I wonder if, given the number of people who have, reportedly, fallen >>> behind on their utility bills, the objective is to have customers go >>> (further) into debt with their credit card companies instead? >> Other benefits would include faster funds availability and fewer problems >> with bounced check fees. And if you go further into debt to someone else >> as long as they get paid it's not their problem. > > I wonder how the funds availability will work out. Since the REC has a 5% > late pay penalty, I have usually paid them early. Now, it will be the > day before. <g> >
I developed such a payment system for a company I once worked for and it was not so much something that the company needed. The rates at the time, which I also assisted in developing in earlier years, did not foresee the impact merchant account processing fees which could take as much as 3% - we did put a cap on the upper payment limit to avoid a customer paying a $1,000,000 bill with VISA - don't know if that's even possible but our limit was $1,000. What really drove the move to online payment was primarily customer pressure for the convenience, although there was also a sort of peer pressure in the industry to appear "progressive" - whatever that means.
In answer to your comment about cousin Bill's wife going part time to save money - maybe not so much her, but future employees hired part time can save a *bundle* if the part time employment terms exclude medical insurance and retirement benefits, which they often do. Even in a union environment, part time employees don't get the same union representation as the lifers - that's an area companies fight very hard to control.
It doesn't make sense to think the utility's objective might be to drive people deeper in debt - what purpose would be served by that?
|
 | Ann <nntpmail@e | | NewsGroup User |
| Re: What's in it for them? | 6/10/2008 7:04:16 PM |
| 0 |   |
| On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:51:30 -0500, AL wrote:
> Ann wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:18:05 -0400, Elmo wrote: >> >>> Ann wrote: >>>> Both my electric (REC) and phone companies have just begun letting >>>> customers pay their bill online, by credit (or debit) card. >>>> Ordinarily an organization would do this because paying the credit >>>> card processing fee costs less than hand-processing paper checks. >>>> But, both are small outfits and I doubt either will realize the >>>> potential savings by cutting cousin Bill's wife back to part time. >>>> >>>> I wonder if, given the number of people who have, reportedly, fallen >>>> behind on their utility bills, the objective is to have customers go >>>> (further) into debt with their credit card companies instead? >>> Other benefits would include faster funds availability and fewer >>> problems with bounced check fees. And if you go further into debt to >>> someone else as long as they get paid it's not their problem. >> >> I wonder how the funds availability will work out. Since the REC has a >> 5% late pay penalty, I have usually paid them early. Now, it will be >> the day before. <g> >> >> > > > I developed such a payment system for a company I once worked for and it > was not so much something that the company needed. The rates at the time, > which I also assisted in developing in earlier years, did not foresee the > impact merchant account processing fees which could take as much as 3% - > we did put a cap on the upper payment limit to avoid a customer paying a > $1,000,000 bill with VISA - don't know if that's even possible but our > limit was $1,000. What really drove the move to online payment was > primarily customer pressure for the convenience, although there was also a > sort of peer pressure in the industry to appear "progressive" - whatever > that means. > > In answer to your comment about cousin Bill's wife going part time to save > money - maybe not so much her, but future employees hired part time can > save a *bundle* if the part time employment terms exclude medical > insurance and retirement benefits, which they often do. Even in a union > environment, part time employees don't get the same union representation > as the lifers - that's an area companies fight very hard to control.
My assumption was that going to part time meant loss of health insurance and other benefits. > It doesn't make sense to think the utility's objective might be to drive > people deeper in debt - what purpose would be served by that?
No, I don't think that is the utilities' objective. But I do think they'd prefer that if customers are going to be in debt, it be to their credit card providers.
|
 | Elmo <ElmoHateS | | NewsGroup User |
| Re: What's in it for them? | 6/10/2008 8:05:06 PM |
| 0 |   |
| Jim wrote: > Ann wrote: >> Both my electric (REC) and phone companies have just begun letting >> customers pay their bill online, by credit (or debit) card. Ordinarily an >> organization would do this because paying the credit card processing fee >> costs less than hand-processing paper checks. But, both are small outfits >> and I doubt either will realize the potential savings by cutting cousin >> Bill's wife back to part time. >> >> I wonder if, given the number of people who have, reportedly, fallen >> behind on their utility bills, the objective is to have customers go >> (further) into debt with their credit card companies instead? > > http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/40497.html > > and yes, I felt sad for them...
There are a lot of people living close to the edge. And the edge gets closer every day. Most of us are one serious illness away from bankruptcy.
-- The majority are misguided and ruled by some self-styled leaders, who seek the limelight by fair means or foul. They do not want the Truth, lest they lose their selfish ends and be out of the picture. So, in order to be in the public eye, they invent lies, concoct stories, distort facts, and, in the name of public service, they present these lies before the public. The public is misled either because they are big names or by the very tricks of the originators, who have the ability to misrepresent facts with sensational talks that influence the weakness of the mass mind.
It is the same all over the world -- a game of winning and losing -- the inevitable struggle for existence is in all departments and aspects of life. The struggle goes on and on in religion, politics, morality, ethics, business, industry, et cetera, at different times and places, in different ways, according to the conditions.
|
 | Ann <nntpmail@e | | NewsGroup User |
| Re: What's in it for them? | 6/10/2008 8:32:30 PM |
| 0 |   |
| On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:46:39 -0400, Jim wrote:
> Ann wrote: >> >> Both my electric (REC) and phone companies have just begun letting >> customers pay their bill online, by credit (or debit) card. Ordinarily >> an organization would do this because paying the credit card processing >> fee costs less than hand-processing paper checks. But, both are small >> outfits and I doubt either will realize the potential savings by cutting >> cousin Bill's wife back to part time. >> >> I wonder if, given the number of people who have, reportedly, fallen >> behind on their utility bills, the objective is to have customers go >> (further) into debt with their credit card companies instead? > > http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/40497.html > > and yes, I felt sad for them...
Yes, there are a lot of people between a rock and hard place. And there really doesn't seem to be an end in sight.
|
 | Ann <nntpmail@e | | NewsGroup User |
| Re: What's in it for them? | 6/11/2008 5:52:36 AM |
| 0 |   |
| On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:11:55 -0400, Jim wrote:
> Ann wrote: > >> Jim wrote: >> > Ann wrote: >> >> >> >> Both my electric (REC) and phone companies have just begun letting >> >> customers pay their bill online, by credit (or debit) card. >> >> Ordinarily an organization would do this because paying the credit >> >> card processing fee costs less than hand-processing paper checks. >> >> But, both are small outfits and I doubt either will realize the >> >> potential savings by cutting cousin Bill's wife back to part time. >> >> >> >> I wonder if, given the number of people who have, reportedly, fallen >> >> behind on their utility bills, the objective is to have customers go >> >> (further) into debt with their credit card companies instead? >> > >> > http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/40497.html >> > >> > and yes, I felt sad for them... >> >> Yes, there are a lot of people between a rock and hard place. And there >> really doesn't seem to be an end in sight. > > giving some thought to the phrase or expression "rock and a hard place". > did anyone ever consider why the original phrase was not between two > rocks? or between two hard places? > > just something to wonder about..
Another is "six of one and half dozen of the other" ... and I bet linguists have a name for that type of phrase. To me, putting it that way emphasizes that there is no choice. Yet another is that it takes seven days to get over a cold if it's treated, and a week if it isn't.
|
 | enigma <enigma@ | | NewsGroup User |
| Re: What's in it for them? | 6/11/2008 1:34:00 PM |
| 0 |   |
| Ann <nntpmail@epix.net> wrote in news:pan.2008.06.10.13.41.35.446686@epix.net:
> Both my electric (REC) and phone companies have just begun > letting customers pay their bill online, by credit (or > debit) card. Ordinarily an organization would do this > because paying the credit card processing fee costs less > than hand-processing paper checks. But, both are small > outfits and I doubt either will realize the potential > savings by cutting cousin Bill's wife back to part time. > > I wonder if, given the number of people who have, > reportedly, fallen behind on their utility bills, the > objective is to have customers go (further) into debt with > their credit card companies instead?
i pay my bills online because i'm almost always online. if i have to mail a check, i never get around to it. Fairpoint took over Verizon in my area & they have to call & remind me to pay because they don't have online payment set up yet... i go through twice a month (the 2nd & the 16th) & pay any bills due, including credit cards. everything is bookmarked & it takes me less than half an hour to get it done. i don't have to worry about buying stamps, getting it into the mail, my postal carrier losing it (a very frequent occurance, i'm afraid) or getting to a post office. i even have my medical bills set up to pay online, which is really a lot more convenient because, as i have cancer, i have doctors/labs in both Manchester & Lebanon, and they bill seperately on paper. i can go online, see which doctor needs paying, how much & which place, & pay it all at once.
why on earth would you assume that the idea is to get people further in debt with credit cards? many of my bills are actually paid by EFT, so no credit cards involved anyway. on a semi-related note, one of my credit cards recently raised my limit by a couple thousand dollars, which doesn't thrill me, but they also lowered my interest rate substantially at the same time... and i didn't even have to request it.
lee -- Last night while sitting in my chair I pinged a host that wasn't there It wasn't there again today The host resolved to NSA.
|
|
| |
Search This Site:
|
|